Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

What the hell is wrong with all the bad reviews and all the low scores this game is getting?, I don't get it. I decided to follow my guts and bought the game despise reading all the reviews before doing so, and I'm glad I bought the game, why?, because quite frankly this game is going down as the most underrated game of the year. Why would Game Informer give this game a 6.75? My guess is that the person who reviewed the game didn't have time to actually play the game and/or was expecting something far beyond this universe from a game that had been in development for more than a decade, 14 years to be exact. When I bought the game I knew that it was going to be more of a late 1990's gaming experience, which actually was one of the greatest eras in video game history, and after the first hour of playing it became very clear to me that this game has potential to become something else, but at the same time remains true to the traditional action/rpgs such as Forgotten Realms games. One of the main reasons for Game Informer giving a 6.75 to Too Human was the graphics, HELLO 14 YEARS IN DEVELOPMENT, and that whenever you found an armor, weapon, accesory, etc, there was already something much better available, HELLO AIN'T THAT THE POINT OF AN RPG? Game Informer was not the only one giving such bad reviews and low scores, 1UP.com gave the game a 4 out of 10, A FOUR!!!, that's ridiculous!

Anyway, I feel that the people behind all this reviews had expectations that were unrealistic for a game that had been in development for such a long time, in the end I believe that a lot of people will have to swallow their words when Too Human starts to expand it's universe... downloads!

Does anybody in here feels that Too Human didn't deserve all the garbage it's been dumped with?

Too Human 6.75
Assasin's Creed 9.25

GameInformer scores

They say Too Human is Too Repetitive and because of this the game got the score it got, WHAT? So, Assasin's Creed ain't repetitive?, Gears of War ain't repetitive?, Game Informer, THE MASTERS OF OVER AND UNDER RATING!!!

--------------------

PS3 tag: TipoDLuffy

"...quite possibly the greatest game ever made"

The game was overall, very enjoyable
The only thing I didn't like was how you used the analog stick to attack.
Also the fact that you never get game over helps too... Gave my little brother more incentive to play it...

--------------------

Music. defines. society.

i actually whole-heartedly agreed with game informer on this one. i played it at my friends house and quickly got bored. hearing that it was decent, i got my hopes up, but i just didnt like the gameplay, i found it way too repetitive. also, what really bugged me was silicon knights' lawsuits against the people who were allowing them to make the game...dont bite the hand that feeds you. regardless of that, i actually would've given it a 4-5...it just wasnt impressive enough despite the hype and 14 to make it. if i was making a game for 14 years, i would make damn well sure that that game is a god-send before i even think about releasing it.

--------------------

Aujourdhui a commence avec toi.