Posted: 31st March 2006 12:06
|
|
![]() Posts: 58 Joined: 9/11/2003 Awards: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OK, I have had my FF3 cartridge, played it a lot, and the battery has not died out, so I recommend getting both, just in case, and playing it on ff3 first.
|
Post #112645
|
Posted: 31st March 2006 19:26
|
|
![]() Posts: 1,249 Joined: 25/5/2005 Awards: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Definitely the SNES version. Playstation remakes don't improve games; they ruin them.
FFVI was ok for the PSX. I started off in the ROM version and it was quite the great stuff, but at that time I was a lowly FFVII fanboy so I didn't play much. Once I got the PSX version, I was finally free to play it off the computer, but the loading times were WORSE than FFV's turned out (Don't even get me started with how much Chrono Trigger sucked aswell and FFIV's saving/loading save files menu). The songs weren't really that butchered. And later on I finally found a used FFIIIus copy and decided to buy it because it was the RPG that convinced me to go backwards in FF history. My first FFV was the Anthology one. And dear God, how much I was BORED with it. I only made it far to the Floating Ruins and let my friend borrow the game because of how cruddy it was. When he told me that there are more worlds, I was pissed off, but as I got farther, it started getting more comfortable, yet it was still the crappy PSX FFV I knew and hated. That's why I considered downloading RPGe's English Patch and SnesTool it to my FF5.smc file. And man, oh man, how much I LOVED it. I loved it so much that I wanted to eat Exdeath off the screen along with Butz, Lenna, Faris, and Galuf. I don't know what FF Anthology is anymore (figure of speech) ![]() I learned my lesson: I will NEVER try out any other PSX ported classics again. I just hope FFVa and FFVIa turns out well or better =) =) |
Post #112673
|