Written by |
SSJ_Cloud |
Former Data Collector | |
Member Since: 2001-09-17 | |
News articles posted: 66 | |
More articles by SSJ_Cloud |
Ejoty | Comment 1: 2004-03-05 03:26 |
I'm glad to hear evidence that systems are selling well. Of course the main thing I care about is the quality of the games... but it just sucks when great systems (like the last couple Sega ones) go under. I hope the game industry can be more stable than it was in the late 90's so we don't get stuck paying for systems that only end up getting a few good games. | |
Del S | Comment 2: 2004-03-05 17:28 |
I now wonder if the continued sucess of the PS2 is to balme for the recent delaying of the PSP's European and North American release dates. I belive it is, as Sony knows that theres a major risk from trying to beat the Game Boy, so they may try and have a christmas to make cash at hoem from it, whislt the North American and Euro markets take up more money to reduce a potential loss. Some very good news for the gamecube i think. Its so nice to see a console you can juggle that isnt a handheld doing better... | |
i90east | Comment 3: 2004-03-05 20:50 |
Maybe this will be a reality check for console makers. Remember when new consoles never costed more than $150? Unless I'm imagining things that's the way it always was before. Who the hell are they marketing $300 systems to? People who choose to go to college will be broke for the next 40 years of their lives. Kids ain't got no $300 laying around and parents won't be dishing out that kind of cash for a video game system. Well the market is saturated with these super powerful systems. If the companies want to run a profitable business they should focus on games for the next few years instead of expensive hardware. The more expensive a generation of gaming consoles is, the longer that generation should last. Games are very profitable, systems arn't. But it's a rough world and every console maker has to be the best and raise the bar again and again. This puts a lot of unnecessary stress on the companies and the weaker ones will fall out, like Sega. | |
Rangers51 | Comment 4: 2004-03-05 22:21 |
Quote (i90east @ 5th March 2004 14:50) Maybe this will be a reality check for console makers. Remember when new consoles never costed more than $150? Just as an aside, I paid $199.99 for my SNES two weeks after it came out. | |
Dirk Diggler | Comment 5: 2004-03-07 14:12 |
Its nice to see the 'Cube is doing better. I've always been a fan of the Big N , and it would have been a shame to see Nintendo reduced to a puppet company like Sega. Lets hope they can release MORE original games while sticking to franchies such as Metroid and Zelda. | |
Sherick | Comment 6: 2004-04-27 21:35 |
HELL YEAH FOR NINTENDO! (Party at Mario's) | |
karasuman | Comment 7: 2004-04-27 21:46 |
Uh, go Nintendo? I'm really not very impressed with the Game Cube, myself. I was given one as an unsolicited gift by my ex-boyfriend, who bought it used. I didn't really get the impression that they were very popular. Maybe I just hang in different circles. | |
GamblingCat | Comment 8: 2004-04-27 22:20 |
My question is what Nintendo's next console system is going to be like and that if it will have a DVD function, online play, and backward compatibility(play GC Games). | |
Please Log In to Add Comments |